DogOrthopedic

Nutramax

Dasuquin with MSM Soft Chews

Nutramax Dasuquin with MSM Soft Chews
8.8/ 10 · our score

$50–$135

Check price on Amazon

We earn a commission if you buy through this link. It does not change what we recommend or how we score it — see our affiliate disclosure.

Best for

Step-up from Cosequin for dogs with diagnosed osteoarthritis or post-surgical recovery

The joint supplement to buy when you have decided to buy one and the dog has real, diagnosed osteoarthritis. The ASU component is what separates it from Cosequin and the only reason to pay the premium, and the honest framing is that the supporting evidence is strongest in the laboratory and weakest in blinded canine trials — which is true of the entire category. Buy one product, run it properly for 4–6 weeks, and judge the result against something you measured before you started. Score lowered 9.2 to 8.8 on 2026-08-13: the product has not changed, but we read the trial that tested it by name and found it did not separate from placebo on a force plate, and a second blinded trial by a different group using activity monitors reached the same answer. It stays a defensible first purchase because it is inexpensive, well tolerated and unusually well disclosed. It is no longer a product we can describe as well evidenced.

What works

  • Adds ASU (avocado/soybean unsaponifiables) to the glucosamine/chondroitin base — the ingredient that separates it from Cosequin, with laboratory and animal-model evidence for cartilage protection
  • Same FCHG49 glucosamine and TRH122 chondroitin as Cosequin
  • Soft chew form factor most dogs eat as a treat
  • Genuinely a veterinary-channel line, not just marketed as one — the Advanced tier is sold through clinics rather than retail. Note that the box's "#1 veterinarian recommended" rests on an unnamed survey. dasuquin.com's own footnote, read 2026-09-08, gives the source as a "survey conducted among small animal veterinarians who recommended animal supplements" — so the denominator is vets who already recommend a supplement, not vets. No sample size, date or sponsor is published
  • Published per-chew analysis — you can see exactly what a chew contains, which most competitors do not publish to the same standard — including, unusually, an omega-3 line the equivalent chewable tablet does not carry

What doesn't

  • 30–40% pricier than Cosequin DS
  • Soft chews can stick together in heat
  • Only meaningful upgrade if diagnosed OA — for healthy dogs Cosequin is enough
  • The canine clinical evidence for ASU is thinner than the marketing: the strongest data is laboratory and animal-model work, not blinded trials in pet dogs. No joint supplement has evidence in the same class as an NSAID
  • This exact product was the glucosamine arm of a blinded, placebo-controlled force-plate trial and it did not separate from placebo. Kampa et al. 2023 (Front Vet Sci, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2023.1033188) names "DASUQUIN with MSM Soft Chews, Nutramax" and reports a week-4 change in peak vertical force of −0.05 against placebo's +0.08, while two green-lipped mussel lipid extracts and carprofen all improved significantly. Two fair caveats: small arms — 16 dogs in the glucosamine group, 14 to 15 in the others — and the trial ran maintenance dosing (about 30 mg/kg) through the window this label says to double.
  • Contains no manganese, unlike both of its Nutramax siblings — Cosequin prints 3 mg per tablet and Dasuquin Advanced prints 3 mg per large-dog chew, while this tier has no manganese row on the panel and none in the other-ingredients list (all three panels read 19 August 2026). Whether that matters is genuinely unclear, since manganese's role here is a cofactor claim rather than a tested effect. We list it as a con because the maker sells it as an active in the tier above and the buyer of this tier is never told it is absent
  • No calorie figure on the panel, on dasuquin.com or on the Amazon listing (verified absent 19 August 2026) — two chews a day is two treats a day for a dog whose weight is the strongest lever anyone has

Specifications

Materials
Per large-dog (60 lb+) soft chew, from Nutramax's own panel read 19 August 2026: glucosamine HCl (FCHG49) 900 mg, MSM 800 mg, sodium chondroitin sulfate (TRH122) 350 mg, total omega-3s 90 mg of which EPA+DHA 75 mg, ASU powder (NMX1000) 90 mg, Boswellia serrata extract 40 mg, green tea extract 32 mg. Small/medium chew: 600 / 400 / 250 / 60 / 50 / 45 / 20 / 16 mg respectively. Other ingredients: fish oil, glycerin, lecithin, mixed tocopherols, natural and artificial flavors, rosemary extract, silicon dioxide, soy protein isolate, starch, stearic acid, vegetable oil. CORRECTION 19 August 2026: this line previously read "manganese ascorbate." This tier contains no manganese — it is on neither the panel nor the other-ingredients list, though Dasuquin Advanced prints 3 mg per large chew and Cosequin prints 3 mg per tablet. See the body below
Sizes
Two panels (Small/Medium and Large, over 60 lb) — but four formulas (plain, with MSM, Senior, Advanced) in two forms each, and the form is a formula: the soft chew carries 90 mg omega-3s (75 mg EPA+DHA, large), the chewable tablet carries none, every other number identical (dasuquin.com panels, 2026-08-16) · Counts 84 and 150 on the maker's own list; 42-count tubs (Large $34.99, Sm/Med $29.99) sell first-party on Amazon but appear on no Nutramax count list — about 47% more per chew than the 150, and 21 days of large-dog loading against the label's own 4–6 week phase
Warranty
No satisfaction guarantee. Nutramax's own policy: report within 10 business days of receipt; between 10 and 30 business days a return is accepted only if the product is unopened, unmarked, undamaged and has a year left before expiry. Since the label prescribes a 4–6 week loading phase, you cannot complete the trial it asks for and still be able to return the bottle (verified 2026-08-10).
Made in
USA

What a chew actually contains

Nutramax publishes a full per-chew analysis for the large-dog formula, which is more than most of the category manages:

Active ingredientPer large-dog chew
Glucosamine hydrochloride (FCHG49)900 mg
Sodium chondroitin sulfate (TRH122)350 mg
MSM800 mg
Avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU)90 mg
Boswellia serrata extract40 mg
Decaffeinated green tea extract32 mg

The administration schedule for dogs over 60 lb is two chews daily for 4–6 weeks, then one daily. Buy the count with that arithmetic in mind: 150 chews is 75 days at the loading dose, not five months.

The running cost, stated plainly

At the verified Amazon price of $84.99 for 150 chews, a large dog costs about $1.13 a day to load and $0.57 a day to maintain — call it $207 a year after the first bottle. That is not a criticism; it is the number the decision should be made with, because the failure mode with this product is not buying it, it is paying for it indefinitely without ever checking whether it earned the spot.

The evidence, honestly

Updated 13 August 2026, and this is the most important paragraph on the page. This exact product has now been tested in a blinded, placebo-controlled trial that measured dogs on a force plate rather than asking their owners, and it did not separate from placebo. Kampa et al. 2023 (Frontiers in Veterinary Science, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2023.1033188) names its glucosamine arm as "DASUQUIN with MSM Soft Chews, Nutramax Laboratories Consumer Care, Inc." at about 30 mg of glucosamine per kg daily. At week four the change in peak vertical force was −0.05 in that arm against +0.08 on placebo, while two green-lipped mussel lipid extracts and carprofen all improved significantly. A separate group reached the same answer by a different route: 30 dogs on a glucosamine/chondroitin product and 30 on placebo wore activity monitors for 97 days with no difference in activity counts (Scott, Evans & Conzemius 2017, VCOT 30(5):318-323).

Two caveats we owe the product, because they are real. Fifteen dogs per arm cannot exclude a modest effect, and that trial was powered to detect the mussel extract's benefit rather than to rule out a smaller one. And the trial ran maintenance dosing for all six weeks — roughly one large-dog chew — through the exact window this label tells you to give two. Nobody has run the trial at the loading dose. The full comparison is in green-lipped mussel vs glucosamine.

The glucosamine/chondroitin base is the most-studied part, and decades of canine trials on that base have produced modest, inconsistent results. The ASU component — the reason this product exists as a step above Cosequin — has supportive laboratory and animal-model work behind it, but the blinded clinical-trial evidence in pet dogs is thin, and we will not pretend otherwise. Caregiver placebo effects in this exact setting are large and measured: owners scoring their own dog's lameness in a blinded trial produced a 39.7% placebo response rate. That is why our advice is always the same: run one supplement at a time, for the full loading period, against a measurement you took before the first chew.

Who should not buy it

A healthy dog with no diagnosis — Cosequin covers the maintenance case for less money. A household that cannot commit to the 4–6 week loading period and an honest review at the end of it. And any owner expecting NSAID-scale results: if the dog is visibly painful, the conversation to have is with a vet about analgesia, not with a supplement bottle.

Sizing: the 60 lb line decides which tub, and what you pay for it

Almost everything written about this product treats "Dasuquin with MSM" as one thing. It is two, and the boundary is 60 lb of dog.

Small/Medium chewLarge chew
Glucosamine HCl600 mg900 mg
Chondroitin250 mg350 mg
MSM400 mg800 mg
ASU45 mg90 mg
Boswellia / green tea20 / 16 mg40 / 32 mg
Counts sold42, 8442, 84, 150
Reference price$49.99 / 84 ct$84.99 / 150 ct
Cost per chew$0.60$0.57

Nutramax's own chart, read from its product page on 19 August 2026: a 30–59 lb dog takes 2 small/medium chews daily for the initial 4–6 weeks, then 1 daily. A 60–120 lb dog takes 2 large chews, then 1.

Put those together and you get the counter-intuitive result. The smaller dog is the more expensive one to feed, and gets less. A 59 lb dog runs about $217 a year on 600 mg of glucosamine a day; a 61 lb dog runs about $207 a year on 900 mg. Two pounds of dog, ten dollars a year cheaper, half again as much of every active. There is no 150-count tub in the small/medium chew line, which is where most of that gap comes from.

The practical instruction: if your dog is anywhere near 60 lb, weigh him on the practice scales before you order. Do not guess, and do not use last year's number — a dog with a sore joint who has been moving less has usually gained, which in this one narrow respect works in your favour.

Two failure modes this section exists to prevent. Buying the Large tub for a 50 lb dog because it is better value per chew gives him a 50% overdose of everything; the likeliest consequence is loose stool rather than harm, but it is not the label's dose and it is not what your vet asked for. And buying the 42-count tub to "try it" gives a 55 lb dog 21 days at the loading dose, against a label that asks for 28 to 42 — you will stop before the trial finishes and learn nothing. The 84-count is exactly 42 days for that dog, with no chews spare.

Head-to-head against GlycoFlex, on one axis: milligrams per dollar

The nearest competitor by price is VetriScience's Extra Strength Healthy Hip & Joint, the product sold as GlycoFlex Stage 3 until the line was renamed. We do not sell it, so this comparison costs us nothing to make honestly.

Maintenance, per day55 lb dog70 lb dog
Dasuquin cost$0.60$0.57
GlycoFlex cost$0.19$0.37
Dasuquin glucosamine600 mg900 mg
GlycoFlex glucosamine500 mg1,000 mg
Dasuquin chondroitin250 mg350 mg
GlycoFlex chondroitin0 mg0 mg

For a dog over 60 lb, GlycoFlex delivers more glucosamine and more MSM for two-thirds of the money, and Dasuquin's argument narrows to chondroitin, ASU, and the fact that a vet named it. For a dog between 31 and 60 lb the crossover reverses: GlycoFlex's maintenance dose is half a tablet, so the cheaper product is also the smaller one. GlycoFlex contains no chondroitin at any size, and its maker's own "up to 41%" hind-leg-strength claim traces to no study we could find in Europe PMC on 19 August 2026. The whole comparison, with every panel and receipt, is in Dasuquin vs GlycoFlex.

If chondroitin is specifically why you are buying — because a vet named it — the comparison that matters is a different one, added 24 August 2026. VetriScience's chondroitin carrier is the Ultimate Strength tier (previously GlycoFlex Plus), and its two forms are different formulas: the tablet carries 250 mg of chondroitin but cuts glucosamine to 800 mg, MSM to 500 mg and mussel to 300 mg, while two chews carry 400 mg of chondroitin on top of the full Extra Strength actives — the maker's own comparison copy, read on vetriscience.com that day. Priced per day for a 70 lb dog at maintenance, the chondroitin options line up as: Dasuquin 350 mg at $0.57, Ultimate Strength chews 400 mg at $1.06 ($31.71 per 60-count), Ultimate Strength tablets 250 mg at $0.40 ($47.99 per 120 direct). So Dasuquin is not the cheapest chondroitin — the Ultimate tablet is — but it is the most chondroitin per dollar among the products that do not also strip the other actives to carry it, and the only one of the three with ASU. The full tier teardown is in VetriScience Extra Strength vs Ultimate Strength.

Manganese: what this tub does not contain, and a correction

Added 19 August 2026, and it begins with a correction to this page.

Until that morning the materials line above listed "manganese ascorbate" among this product's ingredients. It should not have. Dasuquin with MSM contains no manganese. We read four panels on Nutramax's own site to be sure: with-MSM soft chews, with-MSM chewable tablets, plain soft chews, plain chewable tablets. The with-MSM large-dog panel has exactly eight rows — glucosamine 900 mg, MSM 800 mg, chondroitin 350 mg, total omega-3s 90 mg, EPA+DHA 75 mg, ASU 90 mg, Boswellia 40 mg, green tea 32 mg — and manganese is not one of them. Nor is it in the other-ingredients list, which runs fish oil, glycerin, lecithin, mixed tocopherols, natural and artificial flavors, rosemary extract, silicon dioxide, soy protein isolate, starch, stearic acid and vegetable oil.

Where manganese is printed, across the same family:

ProductManganese per unit
Cosequin, both MSM tablet lines3 mg, as manganese ascorbate
Dasuquin with MSM (this product)none
Dasuquin Advanced, large dogs3 mg, as manganese ascorbate
Dasuquin Advanced, small/medium1 mg, as manganese ascorbate

Two practical consequences, and they point in opposite directions.

If you are switching tiers — from Cosequin up to this, or from this up to Advanced — the formulas are not nested the way the marketing implies. Moving from Cosequin to Dasuquin with MSM gains you ASU, Boswellia, green tea and omega-3s and quietly loses you the manganese. Nobody tells you that at the counter.

If you are stacking two products, this is the row that decides your dog's total. Cosequin plus Dasuquin with MSM puts a dog over 60 lb on 9 mg of manganese a day at loading, all from the Cosequin. Cosequin plus Dasuquin Advanced puts him on 15 mg. Both are computable from published panels; neither is computed on any label, because neither label is written on the assumption you own the other. We argue against stacking either way, at can I give my dog Dasuquin and Cosequin together.

Why the ingredient is worth this much attention at all: it is the only one in these panels with a fatal canine case attached to it. A 5-year-old Pug who ate about 100 joint supplement tablets developed acute hepatic failure and was euthanized on day six, with severe hepatic necrosis at necropsy and severely elevated manganese in the liver and kidneys (Borchers et al., J Vet Diagn Invest 2014;26(5):658–663). That paper's own summary is the fair one: manganese is "a ubiquitous, essential trace element and a common ingredient of joint supplement tablets," and "little information is known about the inherent toxic potential if ingested at higher doses." One hundred tablets is not two, and nothing in that case describes a dog on a label dose. It is a reason to keep the tub in a cupboard and to know which tier you are holding — not a reason to stop giving this product as directed.

Calories: the number the whole category declines to print

Also verified absent on 19 August 2026, on both the panel and the Amazon listing: how many calories are in a chew.

For most supplements that would be pedantry. Here it is not. A large dog on the loading dose eats two soft chews a day for four to six weeks, and soft chews are built out of glycerin, starch, vegetable oil and fish oil — the same materials as a treat. Body weight is the single largest modifiable factor in canine osteoarthritis and the one intervention with better evidence than anything in this tub. A joint supplement that will not say what it adds to the day's intake is asking you to run the second-best intervention blind while it quietly taxes the best one.

We are not going to invent a figure. If Nutramax publishes one, we will print it here. In the meantime, the practical move is the free one: if your dog is on two chews a day, take two equivalent treats out of the day. He will not notice, and it costs nothing.

The tablet is the same product on a different base — and that decides it

Nutramax sells this exact formula as a chewable tablet, and until 4 September 2026 this page never mentioned it. Reading both of the maker's product pages side by side that day, the large-dog active panels match line for line: glucosamine hydrochloride 900 mg, MSM 800 mg, sodium chondroitin sulfate 350 mg, ASU 90 mg, Boswellia serrata extract 40 mg, green tea extract 32 mg — on the same schedule, two a day for an initial four to six weeks, then one a day.

Two things differ, and they are not the same size of difference.

The small one is on the front of the panel. The soft chew carries a line the tablet does not: total omega-3s 90 mg, EPA+DHA 75 mg. The chew costs $84.99 per 150 against the tablet's $77.99 per 150 (both Amazon, both in stock, 4 September 2026), so at maintenance that line costs about $17 a year. Put it in proportion before you value it: Colorado State's canine osteoarthritis fish-oil chart lists 4,374 mg of EPA+DHA a day for a 75 lb dog, so 75 mg is about 1.7% of it. This is not your dog's omega-3 supplementation, and the label's habit of printing the row invites exactly that misreading.

The large one is at the bottom of the label, where nobody looks. The chew's inactive list opens with fish oil, then glycerin, lecithin, mixed tocopherols, flavors, rosemary extract, silicon dioxide, soy protein isolate, starch, stearic acid and vegetable oil. The tablet's opens with brewers dried yeast, then dextrose, lecithin, microcrystalline cellulose, mixed tocopherols, flavors, silicon dioxide and soy protein isolate. The omega-3 row is not an added ingredient — it is the chew base appearing on the panel.

Which means: a dog on a fish-free elimination diet cannot have this soft chew, and can have the tablet. Nothing on either listing says so. If that is your dog, buy the tablet instead — this is the one case where the form is not a preference. Note that both forms contain soy protein isolate, so the tablet is fish-free rather than allergen-free; read the inactives against the diet your dog is actually on.

For every other household we would leave this page's recommendation exactly where it is. Seventeen dollars a year is not a reason to move a dog off something he takes willingly, and a supplement that gets refused is worth nothing at any price. The full cross-brand comparison is in soft chews vs tablets, where this line turns out to be the least dramatic of the four we measured.

The documents behind it: no NASC seal, and more paper than most sealed chews

Because the question "is Dasuquin NASC certified" is one people type, here is the full receipt trail as we could read it on 11 September 2026, document by document. Each one vouches for a different thing, and the honest summary is that this chew holds more of them than any sealed chew we cover, and not the one buyers look for.

DocumentDasuquin with MSMWhat it actually vouches for
NASC Quality SealNone. Nutramax absent from the member list, 19 Aug and 11 Sep 2026The company's facility, labeling and complaint system, audited every two years; random testing to label claim. Not efficacy
Outside manufacturing auditYes. Annual UL GMP certification against 21 CFR Part 111, per Nutramax's 26 May 2022 release (third year)The process, against the human supplement rule rather than the NASC's
Label-claim guaranteeYes, self-declared: "guaranteed to meet label claims," more than 80 quality checks (nutramaxlabs.com)The maker's promise; not an outside measurement
Independent content testSibling only. Cosequin DS met its stated glucosamine and chondroitin in ConsumerLab's 2013 pet review, as reported at the time; we found no published test of this chewOne lot of a related product, over a decade ago
Per-ingredient panelYes. Eight rows, every active in milligrams per chewLets you check the dose against any study for your dog's weight
Blinded canine trial of the productYes, and it lost. The glucosamine arm of Kampa 2023 was this chew by name; it did not separate from placebo on the force plateThe only document here that could have gone against the maker and did

The seal-holders in this category (YuMOVE, Zesty Paws, Pet Honesty) hold the first row and, as far as we could find, none of the last three. That is why the seal on its own is a poor sorting tool for this aisle, and why we rank this chew first on documents while saying plainly that the one trial it entered, it did not win. The full reasoning, with the 1996 Federal Register notice that explains why no regulator checks any of these products before sale, is in which joint chews you can actually trust.

If the seal specifically matters to you, the tablet form of this product is in the same position as the chew, and the only joint product we cover with both the seal and a blinded trial it won is Antinol Plus, which is a soft gel at roughly three to six times the annual cost, depending on where in its label's maintenance range you dose.

Frequently asked

I was told to buy Dasuquin but I can't find it — is that the right spelling?
It is, and the searches that fail are usually a vowel out. The product is Dasuquin, made by Nutramax — commonly mistyped as Dosoquin, Dasequin or Dausquin, and frequently confused with Cosequin, which is a different and cheaper product from the same manufacturer. If a vet wrote it on a discharge sheet, check whether they specified "with MSM" and whether they meant the small/medium or large-dog formula, because the two carry different amounts of every active and are not interchangeable by splitting chews.
How many Dasuquin with MSM chews does my dog need per day?
For the large-dog formula (dogs over 60 lb), Nutramax's own schedule is two chews a day for the first 4–6 weeks, then one a day for maintenance. That initial loading period is the part owners most often skip, and it matters when you do the math on a bottle: a 150-count bottle is 75 days of loading or 150 days of maintenance.
What does Dasuquin with MSM actually cost per day?
At the current Amazon price of $84.99 for the 150-count large-dog bottle, maintenance costs about $0.57 a day, or roughly $207 a year. During the 4–6 week loading period it is double that. Before committing, it is worth deciding what improvement you would need to see at week six to keep paying it — and measuring something now so you can tell.
What is in each large-dog chew?
Per Nutramax's published analysis: 900 mg glucosamine hydrochloride, 350 mg sodium chondroitin sulfate, 90 mg avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU), 800 mg MSM, 40 mg Boswellia serrata extract, and 32 mg decaffeinated green tea extract.
Is Dasuquin better than Cosequin?
It is Cosequin's own maker adding ASU, Boswellia, and green tea extract on top of the same trademarked glucosamine and chondroitin. Whether that is worth 30–40% more money depends on the dog: for a healthy dog on a maintenance supplement, we think it is not, and Cosequin is enough. For a dog with diagnosed osteoarthritis where you want the formulation with the most complete ingredient case behind it, Dasuquin is the one to run the trial with.
How long before I should expect to see anything?
Nutramax's own administration schedule implies the honest answer: the loading period is 4–6 weeks, and some dogs respond sooner. If you have seen nothing you can point to by the end of week six on the loading dose, the fair conclusion is that this supplement is not doing enough for this dog to justify the cost — stopping is a legitimate outcome of a properly run trial.
How many Dasuquin with MSM chews does my dog need per day?
Nutramax's own chart, verified 19 August 2026: 10–29 lb, one chew a day for the initial 4–6 weeks then one every other day; 30–59 lb, two chews then one; 60–120 lb, two chews then one. Two things follow from that chart that the box does not tell you. The formula splits at 60 lb, so a 59 lb dog on two small/medium chews gets 1,200 mg of glucosamine while a 61 lb dog on two large chews gets 1,800 mg — weigh the dog properly if he is near the line. And the chart simply stops at 120 lb. Above that weight Nutramax states no dose at all, so any figure you read for a Great Dane is somebody's extrapolation, including ours.
Can I give Dasuquin and Cosequin together?
You can, and there is no evidence it harms a dog at label doses, but there is no designed reason to. Dasuquin is built on the same two Nutramax molecules as Cosequin — FCHG49 glucosamine and TRH122 chondroitin — and adds ASU, Boswellia and green tea on top. Stacking a 70 lb dog at both loading doses gives 3,600 mg of glucosamine a day instead of 1,800, costs about $2.13 a day instead of $1.13, and removes your ability to tell which product did anything. Pick one. Our full breakdown of the arithmetic, the case-report literature and the manganese problem is at /supplements/can-i-give-dasuquin-and-cosequin-together.
Does Dasuquin contain manganese, and how much?
This tier does not contain it at all, and that is a correction to our own page. Until 19 August 2026 the materials line here read 'manganese ascorbate.' It should not have. Read on dasuquin.com that day, the Dasuquin with MSM soft chew panel has eight rows — glucosamine, MSM, chondroitin, total omega-3s, EPA+DHA, ASU, Boswellia, green tea — with no manganese row, and no manganese in the other-ingredients list. The plain Dasuquin panels are the same. Manganese does appear, printed and quantified, in Dasuquin Advanced: 1 mg per small/medium chew, 3 mg per large chew, as manganese ascorbate. Cosequin prints 3 mg per tablet. So the ingredient exists across the family and simply is not in this tub, which matters if you are stacking products or switching tiers and assumed the formulas were nested.
Soft chews or chewable tablets — is there a difference?
For the with-MSM line, yes, and it is a formula difference rather than a texture preference. The large-dog soft chew lists 90 mg of total omega-3s, 75 mg of it EPA+DHA, and carries fish oil in its other-ingredients list. The large-dog chewable tablet lists no omega-3 row at all while every other number on the panel is identical. Separately, the tablet chart has an 'under 10 lbs' band that the soft chew chart does not, and Nutramax states outright that 'for dogs under 10 lbs. chewable tablets are recommended.' So: big dog who will eat either, take the chew for the omega-3s; very small dog, take the tablet.
Can I return it if it does not work?
Effectively no, and this is worth knowing before you start. Nutramax's policy is to report within 10 business days of receipt, and between 10 and 30 business days a return is only accepted if the product is unopened, unmarked, undamaged and has a year left before expiry. The label prescribes a 4–6 week initial period. You cannot finish the trial the manufacturer asks for and still be inside the window to send back the tub, which means the loading month is a sunk cost you should budget for deliberately rather than discover.
Is Dasuquin the cheapest way to buy chondroitin?
No — and if chondroitin is the specific reason a vet gave you, the honest map (prices 24 August 2026, per day for a 70 lb dog at maintenance) is: VetriScience Ultimate Strength tablets deliver 250 mg for $0.40, Dasuquin delivers 350 mg for $0.57, and Ultimate Strength chews deliver 400 mg for $1.06. The catch on the cheapest option is printed in the maker's own comparison copy: the Ultimate tablet carries its chondroitin by cutting glucosamine to 800 mg, MSM to 500 mg and green-lipped mussel to 300 mg against the tier below it. Dasuquin is the most chondroitin per dollar among products that do not strip the rest of the panel to carry it, and the only one of the three with ASU. We sell Dasuquin and neither VetriScience product, so this answer runs against our own interest in one direction and with it in the other — check the arithmetic yourself on the panels.
How long does a tub last, and which count should I buy?
For a dog over 60 lb at the label's two-a-day loading dose: the 150-count is 75 days, the 84-count is 42 days, and the 42-count is 21 days — which is shorter than the 4–6 week initial period Nutramax itself prescribes. Per chew at prices verified 19 August 2026, the 150-count at $84.99 is $0.567 and the 42-count at $34.99 is $0.833, about 47% more. The 42-count also appears on no count list on Nutramax's own product page, which names 84 and 150 for large dogs. Buy the 150 unless you are testing palatability.
Is Dasuquin NASC certified?
No. Nutramax Laboratories does not appear on the National Animal Supplement Council member list, read at source on 19 August and again on 11 September 2026, and no page on nutramaxlabs.com or dasuquin.com mentions the NASC. What the company publishes instead is an annual Good Manufacturing Practice certification from Underwriters Laboratories audited against 21 CFR Part 111, the federal rule for human dietary supplement manufacture, and a statement that every product is "guaranteed to meet label claims" with more than 80 quality checks. The NASC seal is an audit of a company's facility, labeling and complaint system every two years plus random testing; it is not a test of efficacy and its absence here is a difference in which audit was chosen, not evidence about the chew. Our full breakdown of what verifies a joint chew is at /supplements/most-trusted-dog-joint-chews.

Where we recommend it

The articles this product earns a place in, and the context it earns it for.

Know someone whose dog is doing this? Send it to them.